Regulation
The regulation of television adverts are important because the advertisements need to be sensible, legal, honest and truthful in order to get this across to be shown to viewers. Also another reason why it gets regulated is because the advert that may be shown can be offensive to the viewers, whether it is racist or discrimination etc.
The role of the ASA is to ensure that advertising in all forms from the newspapers, internet is all legal, honest and decent.
The role of Ofcom is that they are the authority of competition of telecommunications, broadcasting and postal industries of the United Kingdom.
The ASA are particularly have concerns to adverts such as
The role of Ofcom is that they are the authority of competition of telecommunications, broadcasting and postal industries of the United Kingdom.
The ASA are particularly have concerns to adverts such as
- Harm and Offence
- Environmental Claims
- Racism
Is the advert misleading or inaccurate? This question asks that if the advert is good and it gives out information.
Might it cause offence to people seeing it, or could it cause harm to anyone, especially to children? This question asks if causes offence to anyone.
The ASA decide whether the advertisements are legal, honest, decent and truthfully.
The tobacco advertisement "Hamlet", was giving false information, all there adverts were basically saying when in a bad situation smoking makes you happy and everything better. The ASA's intervention of these tobacco adverts is that in 1965 cigarette ads is banned on television, but cigars and loose tobacco can continue to be advertised. In 1975 the rules are set up for other types of cigarette advertising.
There are many of the most controversial advertisements:
The Maltesers, this is because it gives false information about "the chocolate with the less fattening centres". This quote is saying that the malteasers chocolate will help you stay slim. The ASA said that the malteasers advert was giving false information that malteasers were a low energy food. My personal opinion on this is that giving false information for customers to buy the product is wrong because the customers will not realise that maltesers makes you put on weight.
Another advert is Paddy Power, 220 viewers thought that it is offensive to blind people and 1,070 thought that it was harmful and offensive. They also thought this advert may think to viewers that condoning animal cruelty is a good thing. The ASA's comments on this about the advert was that they said that "it was not offensive in itself to create an advert referring to people with a disability". But the ASA's final decision about this advert is that this advert would give an unlikely spread of offence. I agree with the ASA, this wouldn't make people kick an animal while playing football, plus during the advert when the man kicked the cat for the ad it wasn't done by purpose.
Lastly, the poster by ulstertrader.com, shows an image of cleavage, and right next to it, it says 'nice headlamps. What do you look for in a car'. The ASA said that this poster ad had 44 challenged complaints. This poster advert objectified women, degraded them and was sexist. When it comes to advertising being sexist is wrong and comparing cars to women to be bought and its kind of referring women to have loose morales.
The ASA decide whether the advertisements are legal, honest, decent and truthfully.
The tobacco advertisement "Hamlet", was giving false information, all there adverts were basically saying when in a bad situation smoking makes you happy and everything better. The ASA's intervention of these tobacco adverts is that in 1965 cigarette ads is banned on television, but cigars and loose tobacco can continue to be advertised. In 1975 the rules are set up for other types of cigarette advertising.
There are many of the most controversial advertisements:
The Maltesers, this is because it gives false information about "the chocolate with the less fattening centres". This quote is saying that the malteasers chocolate will help you stay slim. The ASA said that the malteasers advert was giving false information that malteasers were a low energy food. My personal opinion on this is that giving false information for customers to buy the product is wrong because the customers will not realise that maltesers makes you put on weight.
Another advert is Paddy Power, 220 viewers thought that it is offensive to blind people and 1,070 thought that it was harmful and offensive. They also thought this advert may think to viewers that condoning animal cruelty is a good thing. The ASA's comments on this about the advert was that they said that "it was not offensive in itself to create an advert referring to people with a disability". But the ASA's final decision about this advert is that this advert would give an unlikely spread of offence. I agree with the ASA, this wouldn't make people kick an animal while playing football, plus during the advert when the man kicked the cat for the ad it wasn't done by purpose.
Lastly, the poster by ulstertrader.com, shows an image of cleavage, and right next to it, it says 'nice headlamps. What do you look for in a car'. The ASA said that this poster ad had 44 challenged complaints. This poster advert objectified women, degraded them and was sexist. When it comes to advertising being sexist is wrong and comparing cars to women to be bought and its kind of referring women to have loose morales.
No comments:
Post a Comment